Theosophical Society, 
THE
LIFE OF 

H P Blavatsky
From Apprenticeship to Duty
1870 – 72
The Spiritist Society
in 
The first meeting with Mme Coulomb
An extract from
Incidents in the Life of Madame Blavatsky -
compiled from information supplied by her relatives and friends and edited by A.P.Sinnett
First Published 1913
PROBABLY
the years 1867 to 1870, if the story of these could be properly told, would be
found by far the most interesting of Mme. Blavatsky's eventful life, but it is
impossible for me to do more at present than indicate that they were 
associated with great progress in the expansion of
her occult knowledge, and 
passed in the East. The two or three years intervening
between her residence at 
there would be no necessity for holding back any
information concerning these — 
the latest of her relatively aimless wanderings —
of which I might have gained 
possession, but no watchful relatives were with her
to record what passed, and 
her own recollections give us none but bare
outlines of her adventures.
In
1870 she came back from the East by a steamer via the then newly-opened 
Canal,
and after spending a short time in 
board a Greek vessel, which met with a terrible
catastrophe, and was blown up by 
an explosion of gunpowder and fireworks forming
part of the cargo. Mme. 
Blavatsky
was one of a very small number of passengers whose lives were saved. 
The
castaways were rescued with no more than the clothes they wore when picked 
out of the water, and were momentarily provided for
by the Greek 
Government, who forwarded them to various
destinations.
Mme. Blavatsky went to 
till supplies of money reached her from 
Apprenticeship
to Duty”, because that is the great transition marked by the date 
of Mme. Blavatsky's return to 
altogether been spent in the passionate search for
occult knowledge, on which 
her inborn instincts impelled her from her earliest
youth. This had now come 
upon her in ample measure. The natural-born
faculties of mediumship which had 
surrounded her earlier years with a coruscation of
wonders had given place now 
to attributes for which Western students of
psychic mysteries at that date had 
no name. The time had not come for even the
partial revelations concerning the 
great system of occult initiation as practised in the East, which has been 
embodied in books published within the last few
years. Mme. Blavatsky already 
knew that she had a task before her — the task of
introducing some knowledge 
concerning these mysteries to the world, — but she
was sorely puzzled to decide 
how she should begin it. She had to do the best she
could in making the world 
acquainted with the idea that the latent potentialities
in human nature — in 
connection with which psychic phenomena of various
kinds were already attracting 
the attention of large classes in both hemispheres
— were of a kind which, 
properly directed, would lead to the infinite
spiritual exaltation of their 
possessors, while wrongly directed they were
capable of leading downward towards 
disastrous results of almost commensurate extent.
She alone, at the period I 
refer to, appreciated the magnitude of her mission,
and if she did not adequately appreciate the difficulties in her way, she had
at all events no companion to share her sense of the fact that these
difficulties were very great. 
Probably
she would be among those most willing to recognise,
looking back now 
upon the steps she took in the beginning, that she
went to work the wrong way, 
but very few people who have had a long and arduous
battle in life to fight — 
especially when that fight has been chiefly waged
against such moral antagonists 
as bigotry and ignorance — would be in a position
at the close of their efforts 
to regard their earliest measures with satisfied
complacency.
The only lever which, as the matter presented
itself in the beginning to Mme. 
Blavatsky's
mind, seemed available for her to work with, was the widespread and 
growing belief of large numbers of civilized
people in the phenomena and 
somewhat too hastily formed theories of
spiritualism. She set to work in 
finding herself there for the moment — to found
a society which should have the 
investigation of spiritualistic
phenomena for its purpose, and which she 
designed to lead through paths of higher
knowledge in the end. Some, among the 
many misrepresentations which have made her life one
long struggle with calumny 
from this time onward, arose from this innocently
intended measure. Because she 
set on foot her quasi-spiritualistic society, she
has been regarded as having 
been committed at that date to an acceptance of the
theory of psychic phenomena 
which spiritualists hold. It will have been seen,
however, from the quotations I 
have given from her sister's narrative that, even on
her first return from the 
East
in 1858, she was emphatic in repudiating this view.
One
of the persons who sought Mme. Blavatsky's acquaintance in connection with this
abortive society was the subsequently notorious Mme. Coulomb, 
attached at that time to the personnel of a small
hotel at 
finding her way with her husband, in a state of
painful destitution, to 
fastened herself but too securely on Mme.
Blavatsky's hospitality at 
only to repay this in the end by rendering herself
the tool of an infamous 
attack made upon the Theosophical Society in the
person of its Founder by a 
missionary magazine at 
later on.The narrative of
the period beginning in 1871, on which I am now 
entering, has been prepared, with a good deal of
assistance from Mme. Blavatsky 
herself, from writings by relatives and intimate
friends of her later years. It 
would be tedious to the reader if this were divided
into separate fragments of 
testimony, and I shall therefore prefer — except
in some special cases later on 
—
to weld these narratives into one, and the use of the
plural pronoun “we” will 
hereafter sufficiently identify passages which
have a composite authorship.
In
1871 Mme. Blavatsky wrote from 
returned from 
She
had to wait in 
determined to establish a Société
Spirite for the investigation of mediums and 
phenomena according to Allen Kardec's
theories and philosophy, since there was 
no other way to give people a chance to see for
themselves how mistaken they 
were. She would first give free play to an already
established and accepted 
teaching and then, when the public would see that
nothing was coming out of it, 
she would offer her own explanations. To accomplish
this object, she said, she 
was ready to go to any amount of trouble —even to
allowing herself 
to be regarded for a time as a helpless medium.
“They know no better, and it 
does me no harm — for I will very soon show them the
difference between a 
passive medium and an active doer”. she explains.
A
few weeks later a new letter was received. In this one she showed herself full 
of disgust for the enterprise, which had proved a
perfect failure. She had 
written, it seems, to 
désespoir de cause, she had
surrounded herself with amateur mediums — French 
female spiritists, mostly
beggarly tramps, when not adventuresses in the rear of 
M. de Lesseps' army of
engineers and workmen on the 
“They
steal the Society's money”, she wrote, “ they drink
like sponges, and I 
now caught them cheating most shamefully our
members, who come to investigate 
the phenomena, by bogus manifestations. I had very
disagreeable scenes with 
several persons who held me alone responsible
for all this. So I ordered them 
out. . . . The Société Spirite has not lasted a fortnight — it is a heap of 
ruins, majestic, but as suggestive as those of the
Pharaoh's tombs. ... To wind 
up the comedy with a drama, I got nearly shot by a
madman — a Greek, who had 
been present at the only two public séances we held,
and got possessed I suppose 
by some vile spook.” [This literal translation of
a letter written by Mme 
Blavatsky
to her aunt fourteen years back shows that she never changed her way 
of viewing communication with “spirits” for
physical phenomena, as she was 
accused of doing when in 
She
broke off all connection with the “mediums”, shut up her Société,
and went 
to live in Boulak near
the Museum. Then it seems, she came again in contact with 
her old friend the Copt of mysterious fame, of whom
[Page 126] mention has been 
made in connection with her earliest visit to 
travels. For several weeks he was her only visitor.
He had a strange reputation 
in 
at this time, declared that he had outlined and
predicted for him for 
twenty-five years to come nearly all his (the
narrator's) daily life, even to 
the day of his death. The Egyptian high officials
pretending to laugh at him 
behind his back, dreaded and visited him secretly. Ismail Pasha, the Khedive, 
had consulted him more than once, and later on
would not consent to follow his 
advice to resign. These visits of an old man, who was
reputed hardly ever to 
stir from his house (situated at about ten miles
from town), to a foreigner were 
much commented upon. New slanders and scandals were
set on foot. The sceptics 
who had, moved by idle curiosity, visited the Société and witnessed the whole 
failure, made capital of the thing. Ridiculing
the idea of phenomena, they had 
as a natural result declared such claims to be
fraud and charlatanry all round. 
Conveniently
inverting the facts of the case, they even went the length of 
maintaining that instead of paying the mediums and
the expenses of the Society, 
it was Mme. Blavatsky who had herself been paid,
and had attempted to palm off 
juggler tricks as genuine phenomena. The
groundless inventions and rumors thus 
set on foot by her enemies, mostly the discharged
“French-women mediums”, did 
not prevent Mme. Blavatsky from pursuing her
studies, and proving to every 
honest investigator that her extraordinary powers of
clairvoyance and 
clairaudience were facts, and
independent of mere physical manifestations, over 
which she possessed an undeniable control. Also that
her power, by simply 
looking at them, of setting objects in motion
and vibration without 
any direct contact with them, and sometimes at a
great distance, instead of 
deserting her or even diminishing, had increased
with years. A Russian 
gentleman, an acquaintance of Mme. B., who
happened to visit 
sent his friends the most enthusiastic letters about
Mme. Blavatsky. Thus he 
wrote to a brother-officer in the same regiment a
letter now in the possession 
of her relatives, and from which we translate:
“She is a marvel, an unfathomable 
mystery. That which she produces is simply
phenomenal; and without believing any 
more in spirits than I ever did, I am ready to
believe in witchcraft. If it is 
after all but jugglery, then we have in Mme.
Blavatsky a woman who beats all the 
Boscos and Robert Houdin's
of the century by her address. . . . Once I showed 
her a closed medallion containing the portrait of
one person and the hair of 
another, an object which I had had in my
possession but a few months, which was 
made at 
' Oh ! it is your godmother's
portrait and your cousin's hair. Both are dead,' 
and she proceeded forthwith to describe them, as
though she had both before her 
eyes. Now, godmother, as you know, who left my
eldest daughter her fortune, is 
dead fifteen years ago. How could she know ! ” etc..
In
an illustrated paper of the time there is a story told of Mme. Blavatsky by 
another gentleman. He met her at a table d'hôte
with some friends in a hotel of 
alone, sitting on a sofa and talking. Before the sofa
there stood a little 
tea-tray, on which the waiter had placed for Mr N----- a bottle of liqueur, some 
wine, a wine-glass, and a tumbler. As he was
carrying the glass with its 
contents to his mouth, without any visible cause,
it broke in his hand into many 
pieces. She laughed,
appearing overjoyed, and made the remark that 
she hated liqueurs and wine and could hardly
tolerate those who used them too 
freely. The story goes on ...
“ ' You do not mean to infer that it is you who
broke my wine-glass . . . ? It 
is simply an accident. . . . The glass is very thin ; it was perhaps cracked, 
and I squeezed it too strongly . . .!' I lied
purposely, for I had just made the 
mental remark that it seemed very strange and
incomprehensible, the glass being 
very thick and strong, just as a verre
à liqueur would be.” 
But
I wanted to draw her out.“ 
She
looked at me very seriously, and her eyes flashed. ' What
will you bet,' she 
asked, ' that I do not do it again ?'
”'
Well, we will try on the spot. If you do, I will be the first to proclaim you 
a true magician. If not, we will have a good
laugh at you or your spirits 
to-morrow at the Consulate. . . .' And saying so,
I half-filled the tumbler with 
wine and prepared to drink it. But no sooner had the
glass touched my lips than 
I
felt it shattered between my fingers, and my hand bled, wounded by a broken 
piece in my instinctive act at grasping the tumbler
together when I felt myself 
losing hold of it.“ 
"Entre les lèvres et la coupe, il y a quelquefois une grande distance,'' she 
observed sententiously, and left the room,
laughing in my face most 
outrageously”.
“ During the latter years”, Mme. de Jelihowsky states, “many were the changes 
that had taken place in our family: our grandfather
and our aunt's husband, who 
had both occupied very high official positions in 
whole family had left the 
Blavatsky
had not visited the country for years, and there remained in 
but myself with my family and a number of old
servants, formerly serfs of the 
family, who, once liberated, could not be kept without
wages in the house they 
had been born in, and were gradually being sent
away. These people, some of whom 
owing to old age were unable to work for their
living, came constantly to me 
for help. Unable to pension so many, I did what I
could for them ; 
among other things I had obtained a permanent home at
the City Refuge House for 
two old men, late servants of the family: a cook
called Maxim and his brother 
Piotre — once upon a time a very decent footman, but
at the time of the event I 
refer to an incorrigible drunkard, who had lost his
arm in consequence.”
That
summer we had gone to reside during the hot months of the year at Manglis — 
the headquarters of the regiment of 
Mme.
Blavatsky was in 
returned from 
corresponded very rarely, at long
intervals, and our letters were generally 
short. But after a prolonged silence I received from
H. P. B. a very long and 
interesting letter.“
A
portion of it consisted of fly-sheets torn out from a note-book, and these 
were all covered with pencil-writing. The strange
events they recorded had been 
all put down on the spot — some under the shadow of
the great Pyramid of Cheops, 
and some of them inside Pharaoh's Chamber. It
appears that Mme. B. had gone 
there several times, once with a large company, some
of whom were 
spiritualists.[Some most wonderful phenomena were described by some of
her 
companions as having taken place in broad daylight
in the desert when they were 
sitting under a rock; whilst other notes in Mme
Blavatsky’s writing recorded the 
strange sight she saw in the Cimmerian darkness
of the King’s Chamber, when she 
has passed a night alone comfortable settled inside
a sarcophagus.]” 
'Let
me know, Vera', she wrote, 'whether it is true that the old Pietro
is dead 
?
He must have died last night or at some time yesterday' (the date on the stamp 
of the envelope showed that it had left 
which it was received). 'Just fancy what happened ! A friend of mine, a young 
English
lady, and a medium, stood writing mechanically on bits of 
paper, leaning upon an old Egyptian tomb. The pencil
had begun tracing perfect 
gibberish — in characters that had never existed
here, as a philologist told us 
—
when suddenly, and as I was looking from behind her
back, they changed into 
what I thought were Russian letters. My attention
having been called elsewhere, 
I
had just left her, when I heard people saying that what she had written was 
now evidently in some existing characters, but that
neither she nor anyone else 
could read them. I came back just in time to prevent
her from destroying that 
slip of paper as she had done with the rest, and was
rewarded. Possessing myself 
of the rejected slip, fancy my astonishment on
finding it contained in Russian 
an evident apostrophe to myself!” 
'
“Barishnya (little or' young miss '), dear baryshnya! ” said the writer, 
“help, oh help me, miserable sinner! ... I suffer: drink, drink,
give me a 
drink! . . . I suffer, I suffer!” From this term baryshnya — a title our old 
servants will, I see, use with us two even after
our hair will have grown white 
with age — I understood immediately that the appeal
came from one of our old 
servants, and took therefore the matter in hand
by arming myself with a pencil 
to record what I could myself see. I found the
name Piotre Koutcherof
echoed in 
my mind quite distinctly, and I saw before me an
indistinguishable mass of grey 
smoke — a formless pillar — and thought I heard it
repeat the same words. 
Furthermore,
I saw that he had died in Dr Gorolevitch's hospital
attached to the 
City Refuge, the 
made out, it is you who placed him there in company
with his brother, our old 
Maxim, who had died a few days before him. You had never written
about poor 
Maxim's death. Do tell me whether it
is so or not. . . .'
Further
on followed her description of the whole vision as she had it, later on, 
in the evening when alone, and the authentic words
pronounced by ' Piotre's 
spook' as she called it. The ' spirit' (?) was
bitterly complaining of thirst 
and was becoming quite desperate. It was
punishment, it said — and the spook 
seemed to know it well, — for his drunkenness during
the lifetime of 
that personality ! . . . 'An agony of thirst that
nothing could quench — an ever 
living fire,' as she explained it.”
Mme.
Blavatsky's letter ended with a postscript, in which she notified her 
sister that her doubts had been all settled. She saw
the astral spooks of both 
the brothers — one harmless and passive, the other
active and dangerous. [How 
dangerous is the latter kind was proved on the
spot. Miss O - , the medium, a 
young lady of hardly twenty, governess in a rich
family of bankers, an extremely 
modest and gentle girl, had hardly written the Russian
words addressed to Mme 
Blavatsky, when she was seized with a trembling,
and asked to drink. When water 
was brought she threw it away, and went on asking
for a drink. Wine was offered 
her - she greedily drank it, and began drinking one
glass after another until, 
to the horror of all, she fell into convulsions,
and cried for “wine-a drink!” 
till she fainted away, and was carried home in a
carriage. She had an illness 
after this that lasted several weeks. - [H.P.B.]Upon the receipt of this letter, 
her sister was struck with surprise. Ignorant
herself of the death of the 
parties mentioned, she telegraphed immediately
to town, and the answer received 
from Dr Gorolevitch
corroborated the news announced by Mme. Blavatsky in every 
particular. Piotre had
died on the very same day and date as given in H. P. 
Blavatsky's
letter, and his brother two days earlier.
Disgusted
with the failure of her spiritist society and the
gossip it provoked, 
Mme.
Blavatsky soon went home via 
longer, making a voyage to 
Russian friends. Accounts of some of the
incidents of her journey found their 
way into the French and even American papers. At
the end of 1872 she returned in her usual way without warning, and surprised
her family at 
Theosophical Society,